Is it safe for humans to use 5G?

Is 5G safe for people?

5.0 g YG 5 G's is what they call it. What comes to mind when you hear the term "5 G"? Does it make you nervous or excited? In 2018, there was a lot of anticipation surrounding several telecommunications companies' plans to implement 5g, but there was also opposition and worry raised by the discovery that developing 5g in rats' brains increased their risk of developing heart tumors and brain tumors. Why is there so much friction being caused by 5g, and why is it still not even operational?

 First , let us explore

      What 5g is, theoretically Because 5g employs higher frequency waves than 4G or 3G, which are less congested with other devices, it can provide 10 to 100 times the speed of 4G. This allows more devices to connect to the Internet at once and at quicker speeds.   Additionally, 5G antennas are very directional in contrast to 4G towers, which project signals in all directions. Consequently, there is less interference with nearby signals as a result. With 5g, we can anticipate seeing replies from devices that are near to real-time, as it boasts a 1 millisecond latency compared to 4G's 50 milliseconds. A router or other internet-connected device can now be connected to more devices thanks to 5g's increased bandwidth over 4G.

Now, the question is,

We've been wondering since the beginning. Is 5 GHz safe for both people and the environment?

           The problems with 5G are caused by its extraordinarily high frequency, which ranges from 30 gigahertz to 300 gigahertz and is responsible for the waves' inability to travel across great distances. In order to give clearer 5g reception, antennas must be placed closer to one another. We're not just talking a few more here; we're talking a lot more exponentially more!

 Will  these antennas pose health and  environmental risks?

             The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States Environmental Protection Agency, as well as wireless companies, believe that radio waves produced by 5g are safe, and they may be right. Microwave and millimetre wavelength radiations, which are regarded as non-ionizing and don't produce energy that directly damages cells, were used in 5G networks.The dangerous type of radiation is ionising radiation. More than 215 scientists from 40 different countries have urged the United Nations to take immediate action to reduce electromagnetic field exposure from wireless sources, even if they emit non-ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is known to damage cells and cause cancer because its energy can tear apart atoms. These scientists also sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requesting that the agency think twice before establishing a speedy wireless network. 

                    These are part of a fifth-generation wireless infrastructure. Belgium's government stopped conducting 5G tests in Brussels due to worries about radiation from the base stations. Members of parliament and the Netherlands are urging the government to look into 5G further, while Switzerland is keeping an eye on the effects of 5G on people. However, the FCC does not appear to find a need for fear, and the organisation is ensuring that the technology is deployed as soon as possible.

 Meanwhile, U.S. President Trump has proclaimed that " launch a contest that must be won In the twenty-first century, 5g networks will unquestionably be a key link to the economy and security of the United States " .

So, what is the outcome of  all this ? who is right and who is wrong ?

It's challenging

Although 5g does not contain ionising radiation, some experts believe that the radiation from these devices may harm cells by inducing oxidative stress, which has been linked to cancer, diabetes, and other diseases. For the time being, 5g appears to be safe, but there is simply insufficient data to make a determination. Before we make our homes, businesses, and cities smart, it's important to make 'smart decisions' when implementing new technology.

 If you are worried, you can sign a petition to halt the deployment of a 5g wireless network until a suitable framework and guidelines taking health hazards and environmental effects into consideration are prepared.